Bookmark Kaumudi Online  Bookmark this site  Editor@Kaumudi  |  Marketing  Print Advt rates  |  Calendar 2012        Go!    
 
 
January 22, Monday 2018 1:37 PM       

       HEADLINES: Govt begins policy declaration speech; Opposition                                              Actress Bhavana gets married                                              Governor ‘skips’ criticism against Centre in his customary speech                                              PM Modi wishes for happier society on Basant Panchami                                              At least six dead as Kabul hotel attack ends                                              Indian envoy summoned as Pak alleges ‘Ceasefire violations’                                              Kabul hotel attack: Death toll at 18, may cross 40                                              ISL 2018: Kerala Blasters seek revenge against FC Goa                                              Buttler's ton helps England lock series against Aussies                                              Australian Open: Nadal romps into quarters                                              Australian Open: Bopanna-Babos advance into pre-quarters                                              ISL 2017-18: Jamshedpur FC beat Delhi Dynamos with superb comeback                                              Kaumudi Facebook
       INDIA Next Article: CJI Misra to address media soon  
       Full text of the letter four SC judges wrote to CJI
 
         Posted on :17:04:22 Jan 12, 2018
   
A A
       Last edited on:17:04:22 Jan 12, 2018
         Tags: Full text of the letter four SC judges wrote
 

NEW DELHI: In an unprecedented move, four judges of India’s Supreme Court met the press today (Jan. 12) to express concern at the state of affairs in the country’s top court.

Justices Jasti Chelameswar, Ranjan Gogoi, Madan Lokur, and Kurian Joseph—four of the most senior judges after the chief justice of India (CJI)—also made public a letter they sent to the CJI.

Below is the full text:

Dear Chief Justice,

It is with great anguish and concern that we have thought it proper to address this letter to you so as to highlight certain judicial orders passed by this Court which has adversely affected the overall functioning of the justice delivery system and the independence of the High Courts besides impacting the administrative functioning of the Office of the Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India.

From the date of establishment of the three chartered High Courts of Calcutta, Bombay and Madras, certain traditions and conventions in the judicial administration have been well established. The traditions were embraced by this Court which came into existence almost a century after the above mentioned chartered High Courts. These traditions have their roots in the anglo saxon jurisprudence and practice.

Once of the well settled principles is that the Chief Justice is the master of the roster with a privilege to determine the roster, necessity in multi numbered courts for an orderly transaction of business and appropriate arrangements with respect to matters with which member/bench of this Court (as the case may be) is required to deal with which case or class of cases is to be made. The convention of recognizing the privilege of the Chief Justice to form the roster and assign cases to different members/benches of the court is a convention designed for a disciplined and efficient transaction of business of the Court but not a recognition of any superior authority, legal or factual, of the Chief Justice over his colleagues. It is too well settled in the jurisprudence of this country that the Chief Justice is only the first amongst equals — nothing more or nothing less. In the matter of the determination of the roster there are well-settled and time-honoured conventions guiding the Chief Justice, be the conventions dealing with the strength of the bench which is required to deal with a particular case or the composition thereof.

A necessary corollary to the above mentioned principle is that the members of any multi numbered judicial body including this Court would not arrogate to themselves the authority to deal with and pronounce upon matters which ought to be heard by appropriate benches, both composition wise and strength wise with due regard to the roster fixed.

Any departure from the above two rules would not only lead to unpleasant and undesirable consequences of creating doubt in the body politic about the integrity of the institution. Not to talk about the chaos that would result from such departure.

We are sorry to say that off late the twin rules mentioned above have not been adhered to. There have been instances where case having far reaching consequences for the Nation and the institution had been assigned by the Chief Justices of the Court selectively to the benches “of their preference” without any rationale basis for such assignment. This must be guarded against at all costs.

We are not mentioning details only to avoid embarrassing the institution but note that such departures have already damaged the image of this institution to some extent.

In the above context, we deem it proper to address you presently with regard to the Order dated 27th October, 2017 in R P Luthra vs. Union of India to the effect that there should be no further delay in finalizing the Memorandum of Procedure in the larger public interest. When the Memorandum of Procedure was the subject matter of a decision of a Constitution Bench of this Court in Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association and Anr. vs. Union of India [ (2016) 5 SCC 1] it is difficult to understand as to how any other Bench could have dealt with the matter.

The above apart, subsequent to the decision of the Constitution Bench, detailed discussions were held by the Collegium of five judges (including yourself) and the Memorandum of Procedure was finalized and sent by the then Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India to the government of India in March 2017. The Government of India has not responded to the communication and in view of this silence, it must be taken that the Memorandum of Procedure as finalized by the Collegium has been accepted by the Government of India on the basis of the order of this Court in Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record-Association (Supra). There was, therefore, no occasion for the Bench to make any observation with regard to the finalization of the Memorandum of Procedure or that that issue cannot linger on for an indefinite period.

On 4th July, 2017, a Bench of seven Judges of this Court decided In Re, Hon’ble Shri Justice C S Karnan (2017) 1SCC 1]. In that decision (refer to in R P Luthra), two of us observed that there is a need to revisit the process of appointment of judges and to set up a mechanism for corrective measures other than impeachment. No observation was made by any of the seven learned judges with regard to the Memorandum of Procedure.

Any issue with regard to the Memorandum of Procedure should be discussed in the Chief Justices’ Conference and by the Full Court.

Such a matter of grave importance, if at all required to be taken on the judicial side, should be dealt with by none other than a Constitution Bench.

The above development must be viewed with serious concern. The Hon’ble Chief Justice of India is duty bound to rectify the situation and take appropriate remedial measures after a full discussion with the other members of the Collegium and at a later state, if required, with other Hon’ble Judges of this Court.

Once the issue arising from the order dated 27th October, 2017 in R P Luthra vs. Union of India, mentioned above, is adequately addressed by you and if it becomes so necessary, we will apprise you specifically of the other judicial orders passed by this Court which would require to be similarly dealt with.

With kind regards,

J Chellameshwar

Ranjan Gogoi

Madan B Lokur

Kurian Joseph

A A
       INDIA
Next Article: CJI Misra to address media soon
 
 
INDIA HEADLINES
PM Modi wishes for happier society on Basant Panchami  
Over 130 babies born in 4 years of 'Jiyo Parsi' scheme  
Protests against bus fare hike in TN  
Protest demonstration against Vairamuthu, Kanimozhi  
Pak again violates ceasefire, heavy shelling in Rajouri, Akhnoor  
Office of profit: AAP to approach higher courts for justice  
India can attack its enemies on foreign soil too: Rajnath Singh  
O P Rawat appointed next CEC  
Don't make J&K battleground: Mufti  
BJP is main enemy, voting did happen at CC: Yechury  
President Kovind approves disqualification of 20 AAP MLAs  
Yogi govt mulls withdrawing 2013 Muzaffarnagar riots case against BJP leaders  
After Haj house, parks, dividers painted saffron in Lucknow  
Karat prevails over Yechury: CPM rejects alliance with Congress in 2019  
Owner of fire-ravaged Bawana firecracker storage unit arrested  
Ex-CAG a 'contract killer', must be tried for 'cheating' nation: A Raja  
Fire kills 9 in Delhi's Bawana  
Student shoots dead principal in Haryana  
Darwin’s theory scientifically wrong, nobody saw ape turning into man: Union minister Satyapal Singh  
Trump follows PM Modi's steps for country's development: Yogi Adityanath  
CJI Dipak Misra to hear Justice Loya death case on Jan. 22  
School principal shot dead in Haryana  
RS Pura residents flee as cease-fire violations continue  
Judge Loya case: Bench headed by CJI to hear plea  
Will fire 10 bullets in response to one: Ahir  
 
Do you agree with Union Minister Satyapal Singh's opinion that Darwin's theory is scientifically wrong?
yes
 
no
 
no opinion
 
 
 
Home Kerala India World Business Sports Sci&Tech Education Automobile CityNews Movies Environment Letters 
© Copyright keralakaumudi Online 2011  |  Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is prohibited.
Head Office Address: Kaumudi Buildings, Pettah P.O, Trivandrum - 695024, India.
Online queries talk to Deepu Sasidharan, + 91 98472 38959 or Email deepu[at]kaumudi.com
Customer Service -Advertisement Disclaimer Statement   |  Copyright Policy